<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1557350231232256&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Hauling Hazards: Learning From The Takata Truck Explosion

Posted by Jeffrey Forbes on Nov 10, 2016 9:00:00 AM


After a recent trucking accident led to an explosion that killed a woman, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has ordered a trucking company to cease operations temporarily.  The order stems from an accident on August 22 that resulted from a truck taking a curve in the road at too high a speed and rolling over.  The vehicle was transporting hazardous materials and the resulting explosion completely destroyed one house while damaging several others in the area in addition to the previously mentioned fatality. 

The company involved, Industrial Transit, transported air bag components.  The components contained materials considered both hazardous and explosive.   The transit company operates five trucks out of a location in Georgia.

READ MORE: First Steps OF ELD Compliance For Trucking Carriers

How Can FMCSA Put The Breaks On A Business?

The FMCSA has the authority under several federal statutes as well as its own regulations and the regulations of the Department of Transportation to stop companies from operating upon a finding that the company’s continued operation poses an imminent hazard to the public.  Violations of the imminent hazard order can result in both large civil fines as well as criminal penalties such as imprisonment.

Sign up for trucking professionals newsletter

More Details Considered By FMCSA In This Case

In issuing the imminent hazard order, the FMCSA issued a host of investigatory findings against the company to justify the administration’s determination that the company posed an imminent hazard:

  1. In the past two and half months, the company allowed two separate drivers without valid commercial driver’s licenses to operate company vehicles.
  2. The company allowed a driver who refused to submit to drug and alcohol screening to operate a vehicle hauling explosive hazardous materials.
  3. Industrial Transit also failed to maintain and repair its vehicles. The company’s vehicles had failed their last ten roadside inspections, resulting in either the vehicle being placed out of service or a citation for safety violations.
  4. The company also failed to monitor its drivers to ensure compliance with hours of service requirements. READ MORE: Truckers And IMEs- A Growing Trend After Accidents
  5. Industrial Transit’s drivers did not receive security training or hazardous materials training to allow the drivers to transport hazardous materials safely.
  6. The company also failed to keep appropriate documentation as it related to the hauling of hazardous materials and failed to notify the National Response Center within the required time period after the crash.

Are You Wondering  How The FSMA Regulations  Will Affect Your Trucking Business?

Key Takeaways For Freight Carriers

Ultimately, the imminent hazard order in this case appears to stem from a company’s complete failure to institute appropriate safety and compliance procedures.  Sadly, this resulted in a large amount of property damage and the loss of a life in this case.  It should also serve as a reminder for all trucking companies of the importance of implementing appropriate protocols on safety, training, and documentation within their business.  These protocols cannot just save a company on their insurance premiums and the hassles of protracted litigation.  It can be vital to keeping a trucking company in business.

Click for Food Safety Rules for the trucking industry

Topics: Safety At Work, Trucking & Logistics, For Your Business, Road Safety, Chemical Manufacturing, Safety Programs